Baa - fashion meme
Oct. 14th, 2005 08:29 amGlamorous Soul 50% Tastefulness, 53% Originality, 49% Deliberateness, 63% Sexiness |
[Tasteful Original Deliberate Sexy] You choose your outfits carefully according to many criteria. You don't like looking cheap, dull or random and you go to great lengths to avoid this. You are successful, too. People admire your taste and sex appeal. Many try to imitate you but not many can recreate your unique style. Sometimes, however, they find you too intimidating to approach. If you don't wear retro style yet, perhaps you should consider it. It would become greatly your sexy, mysterious self. The opposite style from yours is Fashion Enemy [Flamboyant Conventional Random Prissy]. All the categories: Fashion Enemy Bar Cruiser Kid Next Door Sex Bomb Hippie Kid Fashion Rebel Fashion Artist Catwalk God(ess) Librarian Sporty Hottie Office Master Uptown Girl/ Boy Brainy Student Movie Star Fashionista Glamorous Soul |
![]() |
| Link: The Fashion Style Test written by mari-e on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test |


Not what I expected for me!
Date: 2005-10-14 01:43 pm (UTC)61% Tastefulness, 39% Originality, 64% Deliberateness, 40% Sexiness
[Tasteful Conventional Deliberate Prissy]
Your style is professional. Your clothes always fit the situation and you probably never offend people by, say, wearing pink to a funeral. You just know what becomes. You don't like extravagance too much and you're not accidental. Your well chosen, stylish outfits communicate that you're a serious person. Following classic rules about dressing, you make sure that no one would call you flashy and many people admire your calm, composed look.
The opposite style from yours is Fashion Rebel
[Flamboyant Original Random Sexy].
Re: Not what I expected for me!
Date: 2005-10-14 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 01:47 pm (UTC)Re: Not what I expected for me!
Date: 2005-10-14 01:53 pm (UTC)Me?:
Glamorous Soul
48% Tastefulness, 58% Originality, 49% Deliberateness, 77% Sexiness
[Tasteful Original Deliberate Sexy]
The name's wrong, but the scores sound about right...
no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 01:54 pm (UTC)Hmm...
Date: 2005-10-14 02:51 pm (UTC)