Feb. 10th, 2008

w00t?

Feb. 10th, 2008 09:14 am
lsanderson: (Default)
w00t!
Stolen shamelessly from minnehahaminnehaha

Brisk!

Feb. 10th, 2008 10:08 am
lsanderson: (Default)
It's a brisk -11.3 degrees fondly Fahrenheit this morning. But, the sun is shining, the snow is sparkling -- it's too bad it's too damned cold to go outside. There's wind chill advisories out, with a mild WNW breeze at 3 mph, a humidity of 68%, the wind chill is a cool -20 degrees (which is getting closer and closer to the magic point of -40 where both Fahrenheit and Celsius agree). We're expected to gradually warm to a mild -5 degrees today, before dipping back down to -10 tonight.
lsanderson: (Default)
DVDs would burn faster if I clicked the Burn button...
lsanderson: (Default)
Clinton Campaign Manager Is Out
lsanderson: (Default)
Why is it that a few "fucks" improve the script? Because most of us know real men or real women don't say "darn"?

I don't know why it feels so good to hear it on Torchwood. I don't watch much of our candy-assed TV anymore, but I'm not sure our language restrictions even made sense in 1958.
lsanderson: (Default)
WoW, the $34 new DVD burner burns DVDs really fast. 18x. My poor laptop didn't read the DVD into memory as fast as the upstairs computer read and burned one...
lsanderson: (Default)
Army Buried Study Faulting Iraq Planning
By MICHAEL R. GORDON

WASHINGTON — The Army is accustomed to protecting classified information. But when it comes to the planning for the Iraq war, even an unclassified assessment can acquire the status of a state secret.

That is what happened to a detailed study of the planning for postwar Iraq prepared for the Army by the RAND Corporation, a federally financed center that conducts research for the military.

After 18 months of research, RAND submitted a report in the summer of 2005 called “Rebuilding Iraq.” RAND researchers submitted an unclassified version of the report along with a secret one, hoping that its publication would contribute to the public debate on how to prepare for future conflicts.

But the study’s wide-ranging critique of the White House, the Defense Department and other government agencies was a concern for Army generals, and the Army has sought to keep the report under lock and key. More

Profile

lsanderson: (Default)
lsanderson

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 05:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios