Yes, it's kind of complicated. A lot of the country's dissident groups, which the US supports because it disapproves of the military government which changed the name, don't accept the name change and still call it "Burma". Accordingly that's still what the US officially calls it.
Also, the claim that "Myanmar" is more respectful or more accurate is challenged by a lot of linguistic scholars.
People from the country get to have an informed opinion on this, and they disagree. For the rest of us, it's just a mess.
'It's just a mess' is a fairly adequate description of a country with so many ethnic groups and waring areas. See Shan State for more information. I still think it's better to call a country by its own 'official' name unless that name is the head honcho's name or his favorite horse.
no subject
no subject
Also, the claim that "Myanmar" is more respectful or more accurate is challenged by a lot of linguistic scholars.
People from the country get to have an informed opinion on this, and they disagree. For the rest of us, it's just a mess.
In general
Re: In general
no subject
Too True